Publication Ethics

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

Publishing in the IAKP Journal is essential to uphold the integrity of academic research. It reflects the quality of both the authors' work and the supporting institution. All involved—authors, editors, reviewers, and publishers—must adhere to high ethical standards to ensure the reliability and credibility of the scholarly record.

As a publication managed by Politeknik Negeri Bengkalis, the IAKP Journal follows principles of transparency, accountability, and professionalism. Editorial independence is maintained, free from commercial influence.

1. Publication Decisions

The Editor-in-Chief decides which manuscripts to publish based on their originality, clarity, and academic contribution. Decisions follow journal policies and legal standards (e.g., copyright, plagiarism). Editors may consult with other board members or reviewers as needed.

2. Fair Evaluation

Manuscripts are evaluated on their academic merit, without bias related to the author's race, gender, religion, or political views. The editorial team ensures a fair, impartial review process.

3. Confidentiality

Manuscripts are treated confidentially and shared only with those directly involved in the publication process (e.g., reviewers, editors).

4. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Editors must not use unpublished materials for their own research without the author’s permission and must disclose conflicts of interest. They should recuse themselves if a conflict arises.

Duties of Reviewers

  • Contribution to Editorial Decisions: Reviewers assist in publication decisions and help authors improve their work.

  • Timeliness: Reviewers must complete evaluations on time or inform the editor if unable to do so.

  • Confidentiality: Manuscripts are confidential and should not be shared without the editor's consent.

  • Objectivity: Reviews should focus on scholarly content, not personal criticism.

  • Acknowledgment of Sources: Reviewers must identify missing citations or overlaps with other works.

  • Conflict of Interest: Reviewers must not use confidential information for personal benefit and must avoid reviewing manuscripts where they have a conflict of interest.