Publication Ethic
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
Publishing in a peer-reviewed journal such as INOVISH is a crucial part of maintaining the integrity and advancement of scholarly communication. It represents not only the quality and credibility of the authors’ work but also the institution that supports it. Since peer-reviewed publications are a cornerstone of academic development, it is essential that all parties involved—authors, editors, reviewers, and publishers—adhere to high ethical standards to ensure the reliability and reputation of the scholarly record.
As a publication managed by Politeknik Negeri Bengkalis, INOVISH Journal Publisher upholds the principles of transparency, accountability, and professionalism throughout the publication process. The editorial team is committed to ensuring that editorial independence is maintained, and that no commercial influence—such as advertising or sponsorship—affects editorial judgment or publication decisions.
1. Publication Decisions
The editor-in-chief of INOVISH Journal holds full responsibility for deciding which manuscripts will be published. This decision is guided by the paper’s originality, relevance, clarity, and contribution to the academic community. Editorial decisions are made in accordance with the journal’s policies and are subject to legal requirements regarding copyright, defamation, and plagiarism. Editors may consult with other editorial board members or reviewers when necessary to ensure fairness and quality.
2. Fair Evaluation
All manuscripts submitted to INOVISH are evaluated based on their academic merit without discrimination related to the author’s race, gender, religious belief, ethnic background, citizenship, or political perspective. The editorial team is committed to providing a fair and unbiased review process.
4. Confidentiality
Editors and members of the editorial staff must treat all submitted manuscripts as confidential documents. Manuscripts may only be shared with individuals directly involved in the publication process, such as reviewers, potential reviewers, and editorial advisors, when appropriate and necessary.
5. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
Editors must not use any unpublished material contained in a submitted manuscript for their own research purposes without the author’s explicit written consent. Editors are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest and recuse themselves from handling manuscripts where such conflicts exist.
Duties of Reviewers
1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer reviewers play a vital role in assisting editors to make publication decisions and in helping authors enhance the quality of their manuscripts through constructive feedback.
2. Timeliness
Reviewers who are unable to complete a review within the agreed timeframe or who feel unqualified to assess the research should promptly inform the editor and withdraw from the review process.
3. Confidentiality
Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential. Reviewers must not share or discuss the manuscript with anyone except with the editor’s permission.
4. Objectivity and Professionalism
Reviews should be conducted objectively and focus on the scholarly content of the work. Personal remarks or criticisms directed at the author are inappropriate. Reviewers are expected to provide clear, evidence-based comments to support their evaluations.
5. Acknowledgment of Sources
Reviewers should identify and notify the editor of any relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. They should also alert the editor to any significant similarity or overlap between the submitted manuscript and other published materials known to them.
6. Conflict of Interest
Confidential information or ideas obtained through peer review must not be used for personal benefit. Reviewers must refrain from evaluating manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with any of the authors, institutions, or organizations involved.
